Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2960
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorNolasco, F-
dc.contributor.authorInternational Surgical Outcomes Study Group.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-15T16:27:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-15T16:27:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBr J Anaesth. 2016 Oct 31;117(5):601-609pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2960-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there remains a need to understand the adverse effects of surgery and define appropriate levels of perioperative care. METHODS: We designed a prospective international 7-day cohort study of outcomes following elective adult inpatient surgery in 27 countries. The primary outcome was in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes were death following a complication (failure to rescue) and death in hospital. Process measures were admission to critical care immediately after surgery or to treat a complication and duration of hospital stay. A single definition of critical care was used for all countries. RESULTS: A total of 474 hospitals in 19 high-, 7 middle- and 1 low-income country were included in the primary analysis. Data included 44 814 patients with a median hospital stay of 4 (range 2-7) days. A total of 7508 patients (16.8%) developed one or more postoperative complication and 207 died (0.5%). The overall mortality among patients who developed complications was 2.8%. Mortality following complications ranged from 2.4% for pulmonary embolism to 43.9% for cardiac arrest. A total of 4360 (9.7%) patients were admitted to a critical care unit as routine immediately after surgery, of whom 2198 (50.4%) developed a complication, with 105 (2.4%) deaths. A total of 1233 patients (16.4%) were admitted to a critical care unit to treat complications, with 119 (9.7%) deaths. Despite lower baseline risk, outcomes were similar in low- and middle-income compared with high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Poor patient outcomes are common after inpatient surgery. Global initiatives to increase access to surgical treatments should also address the need for safe perioperative care.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectHCC NEFpt_PT
dc.subjectCohort Studiespt_PT
dc.subjectCritical Care/utilisationpt_PT
dc.subjectOperative/mortalitypt_PT
dc.subjectPostoperative Care/methodspt_PT
dc.subjectPostoperative Care/statistics and numerical datapt_PT
dc.subjectSurgical Procedurespt_PT
dc.subjectSurgerypt_PT
dc.titleGlobal Patient Outcomes After Elective Surgery: Prospective Cohort Study in 27 Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countriespt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage601pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage609pt_PT
degois.publication.issue5pt_PT
degois.publication.titleBritish Journal of Anaesthesiapt_PT
degois.publication.volume117pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aew316pt_PT
Aparece nas colecções:NEF - Artigos

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
BJA 2016 601.pdf324,53 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.