Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2637
Title: Iliac Seal Zone Dynamics and Clinical Consequences After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Author: Bastos Gonçalves, F
Oliveira, NF
Josee van Rijn, M
Ultee, KH
Hoeks, SE
Ten Raa, S
Stolker, RJ
Verhagen, HJ
Keywords: CHLC CIR VASC
Aortic Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm/physiopathology
Aortic Aneurysm/surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation
Computed Tomography Angiography
Databases, Factual
Dilatation, Pathologic
Endoleak/diagnostic imaging
Endoleak/etiology
Endoleak/physiopathology
Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation
Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging
Iliac Artery/physiopathology
Iliac Artery/surgery
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Tertiary Care Centers
Treatment Outcome
Issue Date: Feb-2017
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Feb;53(2):185-192.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dynamics of the iliac attachment zone after EVAR, and the association with clinical events. METHODS: A tertiary institution's prospective EVAR database was searched to identify common iliac arteries at risk. Internally validated measurements were made, using centre lumen line reconstructions. Iliac dilatation and endograft limb retraction were the main endpoints. Associations between dilatation, retraction, oversizing, and distal seal length were investigated. Association with clinical events (sealing or occlusion) was also explored. RESULTS: Of 452 primary EVAR patients treated from 2004 to 2012, 341 were included (mean age 72 years, 12% female, 597 common iliac arteries). Median follow-up was 4.7 years. At 30 days, the mean iliac diameter increased from 14 mm to 15 mm (p < .001). Over follow-up, it increased to 18 mm (p < .001). Iliac dilatation ≥20% occurred in 295 cases (49.4%) and exceeded the implanted endograft diameter in 170 (28.7%). Limb retraction ≥5 mm was identified in 54 patients (9.1%) and was associated with iliac seal complications (p < 0.001). Iliac endograft extension diameter ≥24 mm (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.4) and iliac artery dilatation beyond the endograft (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.8) were independent risk factors. Overall, there were 34 (5.7%) iliac seal complications. Retraction of the iliac endograft (OR 1.17 per mm, 95% CI 1.10-1.24) and baseline AAA diameter (1.04 per mm, 95% CI 1.01-1.07) were independent risk factors for seal related complications. Greater initial post-operative iliac seal length was protective (OR 0.94 per mm, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Iliac dilatation and endograft retraction are common findings during follow-up, potentially leading to adverse clinical events. Optimisation of the iliac seal zone providing a long distal seal length and added attention to patients with large aneurysms or receiving ≥24 mm diameter iliac extensions are recommended. Also, long-term surveillance including CTA is advised to reveal and correct loss of seal at the iliac attachments before adverse clinical events occur.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2637
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.003
Appears in Collections:CIR VASC - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EJVES 2017.pdf622,27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.